SEC chair targets proxy advisors and investors

SEC chair targets proxy advisors and investors

SEC to probe influence of proxy advisors on shareholder votes. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission will review the role of proxy advisory firms and institutional investors in shaping corporate governance, amid concerns over politicised shareholder proposals and potential conflicts of interest influencing ESG and voting decisions.


The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) plans to investigate the influence of proxy advisory firms and large institutional investors on the shareholder voting process. This move aims to address concerns about the misuse of the corporate governance system and the politicisation of shareholder proposals, as stated by SEC Chair Paul Atkins.

During an interview on Fox Business last Friday, Atkins emphasised the need to focus on this aspect of corporate governance. His remarks follow a speech last month where he outlined the Commission’s intention to “de-politicise shareholder meetings and return their focus to voting on director elections and significant corporate matters.” This includes reassessing rules that require companies to present ESG-related proposals at annual meetings.

The SEC’s initiative comes amid increasing scrutiny on proxy advisory firms like Glass Lewis and ISS. These companies are currently under investigation by the Texas Attorney General for allegedly misleading investors by supporting DEI and sustainability policies. Additionally, there are reports of the Federal Trade Commission investigating the firms for potential antitrust violations concerning their advice on climate and ESG-related issues.

Atkins highlighted the role of these advisory companies, mentioning widespread concerns about conflicts of interest. He stressed the need to address this issue comprehensively. Besides proxy advisory firms, the SEC will also examine large institutional investors and money managers. These entities often position themselves as passive investors but exert significant influence over shareholder voting outcomes.

Atkins noted that while these investors present themselves as passive, they sometimes overstep by attempting to influence management, which is not their intended role. Although specific actions were not detailed, Atkins mentioned that the Commission would consider “proposals and clarifications” within the next year.


Stories for you

  • How tech is supercharging the North East’s regeneration

    How tech is supercharging the North East’s regeneration

    Technology is redefining regeneration across the UK’s North East region. James Hunnybourne, Executive Chairman at Cybit, explores how AI, digital twins, and sustainable construction are reshaping the region’s economy. With a new AI Growth Zone and major investment underway, the North East is building a smarter, stronger future.


  • ECB to simplify bank rules but hold firm on capital buffers

    ECB to simplify bank rules but hold firm on capital buffers

    The ECB has outlined plans to streamline bank supervision. The European Central Bank moved to simplify oversight for smaller lenders while rejecting calls to loosen capital buffers, underscoring its focus on resilience as the EU’s revised banking framework approaches implementation next year.


  • Rough road ahead as Tesla stalls in US amid EV demand shift

    Rough road ahead as Tesla stalls in US amid EV demand shift

    Tesla’s November sales slump marks more than a U.S. policy hiccup. Across Europe, its once-dominant market share is eroding fast. The company’s 2025 trajectory suggests a deeper challenge — competition, sentiment, and an ageing product lineup. EV fatigue may be setting in.