Novatech wins Proxmox Gold accreditation

Novatech wins Proxmox Gold accreditation

Novatech gained Proxmox Gold accreditation amid mounting virtualisation licensing scrutiny. Its new partner status positions the Portsmouth company to advise organisations evaluating infrastructure costs and migration risk.


Portsmouth technology company Novatech has obtained Proxmox Gold Partner accreditation, strengthening its enterprise virtualisation offering as UK organisations review the cost and resilience of their existing infrastructure.

The status was announced on 21 October and is reflected in the Proxmox partner directory. Novatech describes itself as the first UK Gold Partner, but the historical exclusivity of that claim should remain attributed to the company without definitive evidence of all earlier UK accreditations.

The commercial opportunity reflects debate about VMware licensing following Broadcom’s acquisition in 2023. Organisations approaching the end of longstanding agreements may face different renewal structures and costs, although the size of any increase depends on their contracts, support requirements and the software they use.

Proxmox VE uses open-source technology to provide virtual machine management, containers, networking and storage administration. Features include clustering and availability options. It gives technical teams a different route to managing shared computing hardware from the platforms traditionally deployed in many enterprise data centres.

Virtualisation allows several computing workloads to operate on a shared physical infrastructure. The choice of platform affects how applications are deployed, monitored, backed up and recovered following equipment failures. Changing that foundation therefore requires more analysis than simply comparing the price of one licence with another.

Novatech chief executive David Furby argues that contract renewal should prompt a broader assessment of costs, vendor dependence and the suitability of existing systems. That is the company’s commercial position; it does not demonstrate that a migration would improve performance or save money for every organisation.

Migration expenses can include application testing, staff training, consultants, specialist support and periods of parallel operation. Some applications may depend on integrations or management tools tied to the incumbent supplier, while others can be transferred with relatively little change. Businesses must assess those differences workload by workload.

For regulated companies and organisations running critical services, continuity is as important as the software purchase. Recovery procedures, security controls, access permissions and system documentation need to be maintained through migration. Inadequate planning can create outages whose cost exceeds the apparent licence saving.

The Proxmox partnership gives Novatech a recognised position in the supplier’s ecosystem, with services the company says include assessments, migration planning, training and UK-based technical support. Partner accreditation is evidence of an announced commercial relationship, not independent proof of the outcome of every customer project.

Open-source software may offer greater choice in how systems are deployed, but using it does not eliminate maintenance or specialist expertise. Organisations still need reliable security updates, appropriate support arrangements and internal staff capable of operating the environment.

Companies also need to evaluate future flexibility. Reducing dependence on one supplier can be valuable where systems are designed to allow workloads to move, but replacement platforms may introduce different constraints and long-term commitments. Hardware compatibility and integration with backup systems are practical factors that can limit switching options.

Novatech has referred to its relationships with well-known UK organisations in describing its infrastructure credentials. The 21 October announcement does not confirm that every named customer has adopted Proxmox as a result of this accreditation, and such a conclusion should not be inferred.

A useful procurement assessment would compare several scenarios rather than assume one alternative is automatically cheaper. The first could retain the existing platform under renegotiated terms; the second could migrate selected applications; the third might involve a wider infrastructure change. Each has different implications for software costs, engineering hours, staff capabilities and downtime exposure. This is the substantive business case behind Novatech’s announcement, separate from the marketing value of a Gold accreditation or a claim of national exclusivity.

The development gives Novatech an additional commercial credential as organisations review enterprise architecture. Its significance will ultimately depend on the number and quality of successful deployments and whether customers realise measurable benefits after accounting for the full cost of change.

—