US ends tariff exemption for low‑value parcels

US ends tariff exemption for low‑value parcels

US duty‑free import threshold scrapped for parcels under $800. The United States has eliminated its longstanding tariff exemption for low‑value imports, forcing businesses and logistics providers to reconfigure shipping strategies as new charges and regulatory complexity take effect.


The United States has ended its longstanding de minimis exemption for low‑value imports, introducing immediate tariffs on all overseas parcels regardless of value or origin. The change, effective 29 August, removes the previous $800 threshold that had allowed foreign shippers to send goods to US consumers without incurring duties.

Under the updated rules, international parcels will face standard import tariffs, with a six‑month transition window during which foreign postal services can opt for flat‑rate duties ranging from $80 to $200 per shipment, based on country of origin. Once the grace period ends, only ad valorem rates will apply.

The policy revision expands a narrower rollback implemented earlier in 2025, which had applied only to parcels from China and Hong Kong. US officials have positioned the broader change as both a fiscal and security measure, with White House trade adviser Peter Navarro describing it as a permanent move expected to generate more than $10 billion in annual revenue.

The removal of the de minimis provision — long relied on by cross‑border e‑commerce exporters — has triggered a rapid response from logistics networks. According to coverage by Reuters and Axios, several European and Asian postal operators have paused or restricted US-bound low‑value shipments due to unclear processing requirements and increased cost exposure.

Retailers with strong US warehousing capabilities — including fast‑fashion giants Shein and Temu — have moved swiftly to mitigate the impact, while smaller sellers operating through platforms such as Etsy or Shopify face heightened compliance burdens and potential margin erosion.

Analysts expect consumer‑facing consequences, including higher delivery charges, longer lead times, and reduced access to affordable imported goods in discretionary categories such as apparel, homeware, and electronics.

The European Commission is reportedly monitoring the implications for EU-based businesses, while US importers and customs brokers are reassessing shipment classifications and pricing models to accommodate the regulatory shift.



  • Big Tech oversight pressure intensifies

    Big Tech oversight pressure intensifies

    Big Tech oversight is moving back onto the policy agenda. Former CMA chair Marcus Bokkerink has urged tougher action as platform power grows across search, advertising, cloud, app stores, and AI discovery.


  • JD.com deal faces foreign subsidy challenge

    JD.com deal faces foreign subsidy challenge

    JD.com’s Ceconomy bid has become a test of Brussels scrutiny. EU regulators have formally raised concerns under foreign subsidy rules, putting a major European electronics retail transaction under sharper political and competition-law pressure.


  • Google fines push EU rules into trade fight

    Google fines push EU rules into trade fight

    Google’s DMA penalties have widened into a transatlantic trade dispute. Brussels has fined the company €890m over search and app-store practices, while US tariff threats have pushed Europe’s platform enforcement regime into a wider trade-policy confrontation.